Vol. 13 No. 4 (2018): Über die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Aufnahmeverfahren im Hochschulbereich | Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung (Journal for Higher Education Development)

Editorial

Martin Arendasy, Gisela Kriegler-Kastelic, Dennis Mocigemba

9-13

Acceptance of selection methods for study programmes

Stephan Josef Stegt, Hans-Jörg Didi, Alexander Zimmerhofer, Philipp Karl Seegers

15-35

Fairness as a central challenge of modern admissions tests

Martin Arendasy, Markus Sommer, Martina Feldhammer-Kahr, H. Harald Freudenthaler, Fritz Joachim Punter, Anita Rieder

37-55

Validity and fairness of an admissions test for law studies

Luisa Bergholz, Stephan Josef Stegt

57-79

Why closing the gender gap in college admission tests is not a proper safeguard against discrimination

Robin Gleeson

81-96

Implementation and use of a uniform admissions procedure for teacher training studies in the “Network Admissions Procedure”

Elke Jantscher, Agnes Diebschlag, Christine Kapper, Corinna Koschmieder, Tanja Mössner, Aljoscha Neubauer, Martin Polaschek

97-110

Motives and attitudes: A reconstructive approach to the aptitude for studies in social work

Bettina Brüschweiler, Barbara Fontanellaz

111-130

was-studiere-ich.de and the BEST career choice training: Inte-grated instruments as the key to a successful study orientation

Benedikt Hell, Katja Päßler, Ulrike Leitner

131-144

Scholastic Assessment Test Academic aptitude test – Delta to university entrance qualification?

Doris Ternes, Jasmin Fabricius

145-159

Requirements for students in dual study programmes: Integration of university and employer criteria in the selection process

Stefan Höft, David Ambiel

161-177

Adjusting school-leaving grades for student selection

Stefan Zimmermann, Dietrich Klusmann, Wolfgang Hampe

179-197

Study and vocational interests of high-school seniors: Motives, competences, and social factors

Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud, Gerhard Stemmler

199-225

Letters of motivation as an integrative element of university admissions procedures: An evaluation approach

Julia Zeeh, Karl Ledermüller, Michaela Kobler-Weiß

227-250